Today the company has been distributed yet another leaflet of the cobas (which is not signed Cobas more private work, but Cobas Metalmaccanici).
The flyer is almost entirely focused on the outcome of the vote in the Magna MSW here.
First is challenged the allocation of places in the MSW compared to the percentages of votes taken.
But these men knew what the rules are, and have also signed an explicit and formal.
The rules may not like it and it also has the right to seek to change them in the appropriate fora and with the appropriate instruments. But it can not be accepted after them, use them as an element of manipulation in the debate at the enterprise level trade unions.
Once again to say we are good and their bad, the servants of the masters.
You've already said and repeated the result: 57% Fiom preferences.
Question: beyond the regulation is scandalous that with 57% of the vote will take 5 to 9 seats?
I think not.
When I, or other students say they have read the FIOM slander and lies in the pamphlets cobas certainly we are not referring to the proposed union alternative, God forbid, indeed I hope to compare this with the delegation of the cobas solid and, if possible but we refer the allegations to be (we FIOM delegates) the servants of the company, and above all to make a trade unionism "from above" that which does not make the participant base of workers.
joke but I say! but do not know what world you live, at least when I'm in the MSW (1998) all agreements and was voted out and come in, which in simple terms the workers have always had the last word on platforms and on the outcomes of negotiations?
And then there is a slander to say the opposite?
One last thing: I hope to have more time from now to really start working with the USW thinking about real people's problems and not those related to the trade union bureaucracy, if we do together better because we get quicker and better to the goals, if not, the component of the FIOM Magna MSW has a duty of respect for all workers to go on, do not fossilize self-union issues. In
flyer cobas allegedly in the title to "impose" a new way of operating as RSU.
No one can "impose" new ways. It is not democratic.
The RSU is a collegial body that acts accordingly, with precise rules of democracy that all are bound to respect, including cobas.
The decisions you take after a comparison, a summary and if necessary a vote, which then becomes binding for all.
In a democratic manner.
Regarding the component FIOM, we are willing dialogue within a maximum of solid but will not accept impositions on our conduct, what we have always held: conflict of the combativeness and when necessary, mediation and negotiation where possible, with sobriety and a sense of responsibility for the conduct which workers have given us 57% of the vote. Within the MSW
each delegate has his dignity and his ability to contribute. There are
as some claim, all-powerful delegates, perhaps in the old RSU there were delegates who have committed more and others who were fugitives, but the workers know this and vote for me, I gave an answer also points to this.
I really hope he recovers as soon as possible a dialogue "normal" is to stop "wasting time" and start again to think about problems.
First, the employment prospects of the company: production must end and those that they have to go, for one thing.
We know from statements that the company committed Ford will end in 2008, this division employs approximately 150 people, we want to deal with this or not?
We try to understand how to create the conditions to ensure that new products arrive in our factory and other factories of the group?
I believe this is the priority, I think the first meeting of the RSU will have this as a matter of debate.
0 comments:
Post a Comment